0

The Assasination of Jessie James

Movies

Hallo again, adoring public!

The Assasination of Jessie James by the Coward Robert Ford i rate as Awesome! This is the first movie i have rated that gains this prestigious award.

If you enjoy westerns, history, or just plain ol good acting, well, this movie is a treat. It is a spectacular example of historical drama, and should be recognized as such. While in general, westerns are action films, this is more of a thinking man's drama, wherein the actors have a chance to shine.

Brad Pitt plays Jessie James, the infamous outlaw, who is a troubled man. Plagued with strange humors, doubts, and depressions, his reputation also follows him, not allowing him to have any friends and isolating him from the world. Casey Afflek plays Robert Ford, a dark and brooding young man, with a fragile mind and little self confidence to speak of. Robert Ford has, since an early age, identified with Jessie, idolizing him, trying to become him. Casey Afflek brings to mind the assassins who believed that they were the person that they had murdered. The movie is based of historical events and makes you believe you were a part of that time, as if this were a documentary.

The movie starts with the last train robbery of the James Gang and the introduction of Robert Ford. It chronicles the lives of Jessie and Robert, following their path's as they weave together and apart until their reintroduction and last ride. It keeps you enthralled throughout, due to the excellent characters and character development, and the extremely talented authors who play the characters. I have rarely seen such spectacular, realistic and human characters, nor as capturing a story.

All in all, a must see.

Last words:

Engage.

Tommy

+2

Vanilla Sky

Movies

Well now, work and play as it is, i've been too harried to put up a post, but here comes another!

Vanilla sky is a Tom Cruise movie of a genre near and dear to my heart: Weird thinky movie. I rate this movie Good/ Great.

In this movie, like with others of its kind, not is all as it seems. Tom Cruise is a millionare/ billionare playboy, running the magazine "Bikini" between hitting on women, sleeping til late in the day and doing whatever pops into his head to do that day.

Penelope Cruz, Jason Lee, and Cameron Diaz are main characters in this film, who are, as follows: Sofia, the love interest of Tom Cruise and Jason Lee; Brian Shelby, the best friend of Tom Cruise, and a long suffering friend he is, as David Aames (Tom Cruise) consistantly steals away any woman he is interested in; Julie Gianni, an extremely troubled girl who, to David, is a (in far cruder words) "bed friend", and in her mind, is a devout lover, and someone who should marry him.

Other famous actors play large and small parts in the film, populating the screen with well known faces, and lending their expertise and skill to the rendering of a spectacular film.

All is going well in David Aames' world, till Julie Gianni decides that if she cannot have him, nobody can, and coerces him into her car which she then proceeds to drive off a bridge into a stone retaining wall.

Julie is killed, and David is maimed, scarred, and disfigured, which causes him a great deal of pain due to his vanity. He is offered a "facial prosthetic" by his plastic surgeons, which is a plastic/elastic/rubber copy of his face before the "accident". David, furious, demands that they fix his face by inventing surgeries, but will keep the prosthetic for halloween.

The story is told to us by a Tom Cruise who is masked and in a prison jumpsuit, talking to a court appointed psychaitrist. David Aames is accused of murdering Sofia Serrano, but he denies it strenuously, claiming that she is still alive, and that the board of directors at his magazine have set him up. The story is the story of his memories, told almost episodically, as the psychaiatrist probes for information, trying to get all the facts, and to see what, if anything, David has blocked from his memory.

The story only gets weirder, more exciting, and just darn fun from here on, but as this is a "wierd thinky movie" any more explanation would be plain ol spoilers, so go watch it!

I leave you with a thought: Who was the true enemy, the MAIN enemy in Final Fantasy VII? Sephiroth, or Jenova?

For those of you unfamiliar with FFVII, a quote: "I killed a man with a TRIDENT!"

Tommy

+2

Lets go Indie!

Movies

So, Indie movies.

Dont know what it means? Independant movies, books, music, culture, etc is classified "Indie". What we are talking about here is the movie portion.

The film is "The Signal". Now, as it is late, and sleep is more of a random act for me, i am going to be brief...ish.

The Signal is a spectacular movie, rated at great. This movie is more of a trilogy of short films that just so happen to be incredibly cohesive then it is one film, but in no way does it detract from it. In fact, if this is the result, every movie should have three directors with differing viewpoints.

"Movie one" is a horror film, akin to the movie pulse, or the book cell, or any other supernatural/technophobe medium. Wherin a "signal" -hey, i just got the name! jk- is sent out over technological lines, in this case, telephones, tvs, and radios, the trifecta. This signal creates in the mind of the...user?...imbiber?...viewer? a sort of very very bad acid trip mixed with a stimulation of baser impulses, in this case, murder. The murderers arent zombies, they arent under the control of a demon force/computer/nebulous aliens from planet kjarkifel, they believe that what they are doing is right, justified, or they are performing acts that they have no knowledge of due to their existence in a mental fairy tale.

"Movie two" is a dark, dry comedic horror. To put it simply, its funny. If you enjoy monty python, you'd probably enjoy this.

"Movie three" is (as the directors put it) the soul of the film. Its where you go for the moral, for the triumph, for the defeat, for the connecting of like souls, the comraderie of battle, pick or choose, i wont tell which it is, because my last words on this film is...

Go out and rent it. It may be Indie, and indie is a stigma for some people, but i tell you that it is nothing but a predjudice, aka a blind aversion. Dont believe "the man", watch an indie movie today, odds are, it'll be worth it. I am not sure of the number of indie movies i have seen, though i know mass media far outweighs it, but of the movies i am sure are indies that i have seen, i can say this: they are better then mass media, and often contain the same actors.

Last words from Spike Speigel:

Bang, Bang

Tommy

+2

Yet Another Movie Review

Movies

So, Im back!

I watched Burn After Reading the other day, and my rating of it is Good/Great.

This movie is hard to rate, as it is hard to describe without revealing plot points. The movie revolves around a few characters, John Malkovich who plays Osbourne Cox, an ex CIA agent, Brad Pitt who plays Chad Feldheimer, a personal trainer at a gym, Frances McDormand who plays Linda Litzke, another employee at the gym, and George Clooney as Henry Pfarrer, who is an agent of the treasury.

This movie is the movie of an accidental conspiricy, revolving around the characters of Brad Pitt and Frances McDormand trying to sell a data cd that contains what they believe to be classified government intelligence. Brad Pitt's character is an overall outright doofus, and Frances Mcdormand's character is very insecure and very greedy.

Burn After Reading left me feeling bemused, because, just like the characters, you are clueless as to what is happening until it happens. This movie is a monument to modern day paranoia, as the characters all believe that the government is trying to get them, as they enact what seems to be a spy movie done by amatures. This movie brings to mind another movie which it seems to share some premise, The Man Who Knew Too Little. In The Man, Bill Murray believes he is in a improv spy play, but he really has stumbled upon a conspiricy. Burn After, however, is the polar opposite, where the characters believe they have found a conspiricy, but actually havent.

The facial expressions as well as the dialogue, had an enormous comedic effect on me, though it is more a humor of the silly and ridiculous than straight up comedy. I watched this whole movie grinning, albeit with a bemused expression to add to it, due to the "What Next" type of flow this movie has. This movie, though containing little slapstick, has an aura of slapstick style comedy to me.

Though this movie jumps around, and surprises you from left to right, the ending ties it up well, and i believe that it is the only ending i can imagine occuring for such a movie. The acting was supurb in every way, the characters being realistic (if in an unrealisticly paranoid state), they way they interacted, and all the minutiae coming together to make a Great, though weird, film.

Last thought: I can see this movie becoming a cult classic, because it isnt really a mainstream style movie, but it is great in all the ways that matter to me.

Well, Im off to see the Wizard

Tommy

(If your mind didnt automatically say "the wonderful wizard of oz", i am saddened :-P)

+3

Episode Two: Movies I done saw

Movies

I thank you for your visit, or even (one can hope) return visit. Now, lets dive right in.

Today I went to see the new movie Quarantine. Sadly, it would have been an hour wait, so, not being one to squander an opportunity (only my money), I went and saw Blindness first.

I want to first tell of my descriptors for the quality of a movie.

Bad: whaddaya think it means?

Good: The equivalent of 3 or 3.5 stars anywhere else.

Great: 4 or 4.5 stars, a movie i would recommend wholeheartedly.

Awesome: Not the current use for the word, being "cool" or "good" but the literal meaning, being struck bye awe. 5 stars or better.

That being said, Blindness was "Good".

The feel of the movie was more of a documentary then of a movie, though it was shot with stedi-cam, not the popular hand-held camera genre. It is a "what if" style movie, one ment to make you think "are we capable of this?" and "lets not do that, if this ever really happens". It is a darkly grungy dystopian world, wherin people become infected with something (never really explained) that blinds them. This blindness is more like an oversensitivity to light, methinks, because its symptom isnt blackness, it's whiteness. This comes through clearly in the color palate of the film, mostly whites, greys and blacks. Not that its a black and white film, no, banish the thought, but the colors are washed out, not nessicarily pastel, just whitened, or greyed, shot through a filter, ye ken.

Blindness chronicles the experiences of a few people, the main characters being a doctor and his wife, played by Mark Ruffalo and Julianne Moore respectively. The other main characters, at least in the beginning, are a chain of infection: this person met this person met this person, etc.

All of the infected are sent to a quarantine center, which to this movie-goer's eyes looks like a empty mental institution. Of all the people sent to quarantine, only Julianne Moore's character is able to see, and she is only there as support for her husband.

I would also like to go ahead and say that this movie is rated "R" for a good reason, it shows the basest of the basest actions human beings are able to experience, and constantly. Very little goodness is shown by any of the characters, including the "good guys" who are the main characters.

I'd recommend this movie only to people who really like dystopian movies, such as myself, specifically because of its darkness, color palate, and message. It offers very little of the carefree nature of most mainstream movies, in fact, if i didnt know better, i'd classify it indie. The only laughs to come out of this movie would be the harsh laugh that occurs when the bad guy gets his due.

This movie has a problem connecting with its audience (at least, it did for me), because it skips ahead in time, has an uncomfortable timeless feeling, as best represented by the doctor asking his wife numerous times what time it was. The plot staggers in time, one moment, its day, the next, its night, now a week has passed, now only a day, now a few days. This, I believe, was all on purpose, to show the disconnectedness of the people who were stuck in a facility with no outside contact, and no sight, so no references.

All in all: I'd watch it again, but at a lesser price.

 

Now for Quarantine:

I rate this one Great.

If you are a person who is able to sit and watch a movie, not analyze and criticize while watching, this is a quality movie. If otherwise, I would see it as just a good movie.

A TV crew of one reporter (Dexter's sister) Angela Vidal (Jennifer Carpenter), and her cameraman Scott Pervical (Steve Harris) are tasked to follow a pair of firefighters on one of their night shifts. This movie is a little slow to start, as it is a sort of "get to know" situations. They wait for a call to come in, and after awhile, it finally does.

They are called out to an old apartment complex because of bloodcurdling screams coming from this old woman's apartment. The TV crew and the two firemen are met at the bottom floor of the apartment complex by most of the residents and two police officers. Things progress fairly predictably, but at a speed one rarely sees in a zombie movie, because, dont get me wrong, this IS a zombie movie.

Jennifer Carpenter's acting is a little over the top, only because it is an accurate reaction to the situations she is put in. The non-infected characters perform the same old frustrating actions that every horror movie character performs e.g. "Oh, you were bit by a zombie? Lets have a hug, no, wait, a GROUP hug!". Some of the shock (aka "boo!") scenes are on the rediculous side, but over all, the ebb and flow of the movie draws you in and lend strength and character to the film, and create a compelling move.

All in all, i liked it. It wasn't perfect, but as long as you are willing to watch it and wait until the end of the movie to criticize, it was enjoyable

To Infinity and Beyond!

Tommy

Search